I firmly believe that God does not make mistakes. And so when I am told that I am a mistake, or that what I've done is a black mark on my society, I struggle with knowing what to say. I am human. I will and do make mistakes. But God doesn't. You can criticize me all you want. Heavens knows I probably deserve it and more. But don't blame God for my screwups. I take full responsibility for those. He is righteous, I am not
About Me
- RvL
- I’m from New York but my driver’s license lists that my address is Ohio. My passport has a number of stamps in it. I’m the youngest of six, yet oldest son. I have a number after my initials, but not my name. I like music. I like coffee, beer and bourbon. I am a follower of Jesus. I watch bonus features on DVD’s. For four months each year my wife and I are the same age. “I pledge allegiance to a country without borders, without politicians.” I am an ordained pastor, but don't currently have a church. I’ve eaten raw horse meat. I’m fifteen inches taller than my wife, but I look up to her. I still prefer buying CDs to downloading music. I’m a night owl, who doesn’t mind getting up early. I like to play games. I moved to another country nine days after my wedding. I sometimes quote random lyrics. I believe in miracles. I prefer desktops to laptops. I like listening to audio books. I watch Buffalo Bills and Sabres games. I have five sons. I'm living life mid sentence.
Wednesday, September 26, 2018
Tuesday, September 25, 2018
Agape
We love you, but you really need to become who we want you to be. I've heard that so many times in life that I've lost count. We love you, but... Only a few times have I encountered friends who loved me in spite of who I was. The first one that comes to mind is the love of my life who I married. The second is a friend that spanned a few years and a few states.
I want to be the kind of friend who loves people even when they're screwed up. I want to be the friend who points them towards the right path but will stand with them no matter what path they go down. It's the type of friendship I see Jesus having. He knew Judas was stealing from him, but he gave him a second chance. He knew Peter would deny him, but that didn't stop him from loving him. He knew I would screw things up, but he still loves me.
I count myself as fortunate. In 40 years I've had two humans who loved me in spite of myself. My prayer is that I could spend my remaining days loving five people the way that those 2 have loved me. If that were to happen , I believe I could hear "well done good and faithful servant." And then I could rest.
Saturday, August 04, 2018
#StandingWithOurSisters God Helps Single Moms
How many of us grew up in a home that was in poverty when we were a child?
While poverty does happen in homes that include both parents, about 5 and a half percent, it is much more common in households where a single mother is raising a family. About 23 percent of households include children living with a single mother. And as of 2015 those households have a more than 28 percent chance of living at or below the poverty level.
(https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2016/demo/p60-256.html)..
The first example I want to explore is that of Hagar.
Genesis 16:1-16 (All verses taken from NASB unless otherwise noted)
So, at some point after this reaffirmation of the promise to Abraham, Sarah gets an idea. In their culture it wa acceptable to offer up a slave as a surrogate wife to her husband, to give him the heir he has been promised. It isn’t until after Hagar conceives that God tells Abraham that Sarah will give birth to the promised child, in Genesis 17.
As one commentary puts it, when it says Haggar became Abraham’s wife, the term wife may not mean the same thing that you and I think of when we think of the term. This is how the commentary describes it.
Let’s look a little more at the customs of the day.
So, now that tensions are high in Abraham’s household, we see Hagar fleeing.
Genesis 16:7-11, 13, 15-16
7 Now the angel of the Lord found her by a spring of water in the wilderness, by the spring on the way to Shur. 8 He said, “Hagar, Sarai’s maid, where have you come from and where are you going?” And she said, “I am fleeing from the presence of my mistress Sarai.” 9 Then the angel of the Lord said to her, “Return to your mistress, and submit yourself to her authority.” 10 Moreover, the angel of the Lord said to her, “I will greatly multiply your descendants so that they will be too many to count.” 11 The angel of the Lord said to her further,
Genesis 21:9-14
Can you imagine the feeling? Let’s recap for a minute. Hagar was an Egyptian. We aren’t told how, but she wound up being a servant or slave and having to leave her homeland. When her mistress is unable to conceive, she is forced to marry her master, and she conceives. When her mistress sees that she is pregnant, she begins to treat her harshly—with the consent of her master and husband. To escape the harsh treatment she runs away. The angel of the Lord comes to her, and tells her to return to Abraham and Sarah’s house, also telling her that her descendants will be “too many to count” (16:10). She returns and her son is born. But when her son is 13, her mistress gives birth to a son. At some point after that, the problems arise again. Now, she is sent off by her husband and master to basically fend for herself and for her son. And, when the water is gone, alone they sit in the desert as she pleads with God to not make her watch her only son die. Once again, God reached out to Hagar.
17 God heard the lad crying; and the angel of God called to Hagar from heaven and said to her, “What is the matter with you, Hagar? Do not fear, for God has heard the voice of the lad where he is. 18 Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him by the hand, for I will make a great nation of him.” 19 Then God opened her eyes and she saw a well of water; and she went and filled the skin with water and gave the lad a drink.
We pick up the story in I Kings 17:8
Yet, when given the opportunity to serve others, the widow did so and God provided for her and her son.
Here are just a few of the verses about orphans and widows.
Exodus 22:21-24
Father of the fatherless and protector of widows is God in his holy habitation.
God hears the cries of the widows and the fatherless. And He calls on us to heed those cries as well. If we truly believe that all humans are created in the image of God, then when we dismiss the plight of someone—maybe because we do not feel they are deserving of help because of their own actions—we are doing that to Jesus Himself. That’s not my idea, but rather it was what Jesus said.
34 “Then the King will say to those on His right, ‘Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. 35 For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; 36 naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me.’ 37 Then the righteous will answer Him, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry, and feed You, or thirsty, and give You something to drink? 38 And when did we see You a stranger, and invite You in, or naked, and clothe You? 39 When did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?’ 40 The King will answer and say to them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.’
Sunday, July 22, 2018
#StandingWithOurSisters #GodBlessesTheBarren
We know next to nothing about Abram, or his wife Sarai, before God called them. We have no indication that Abraham was a follower of YHWH or not. All we know is what the text tells us here.
Abram, whose name meant “exalted father”, was promised that if he left his homeland, which undoubtedly meant his culture, religious upbringing, and family, God would bless him in 3 ways. First, God would make his descendants into a great nation. Secondly, God would bless him by making his name great. Finally, God said He would bless those who blessed Abram and through him all the nations would be blessed.
Genesis 17:1-7
One commentary had this to say about the subject. “A closed womb was a deep personal tragedy in OT times. God’s command to men after the flood was to be fruitful and increase in number and fill the earth (Gn 9:1) and later Jeremiah offered the same advice (Jer 29:6). A barren wife in a polygamous marriage was subject to ridicule (Gn 16:4) or extreme jealously (30:1). The social pressure to bear children for her husband was so great…” (Van Reken, D. E. (1988). Barrenness. In Baker encyclopedia of the Bible (Vol. 1, p. 265). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.)
So, as we continue, we may have a little better understanding of how big the promise God had given Abraham , and as we will see now, Sarah.
Genesis 17:15-21
In such a patriarchal culture, that God would single out a woman to bless was a big deal. As we see in the case of Hagar, not only could women be owned, but even when married they and their offspring could be dismissed and written off without much thought.
“…..In consequence of sin thus arises that subjection of the wife to the husband, bordering on slavery, that was customary in the old world, as it still is in the East, and which through the religion of revelation becomes gradually more tolerable, until, at last, in the increasing worth of the woman, it becomes entirely evened” (Delitzsch).” (Lange, et al pp. 237–238.)
Sarah’s grandson Jacob’s beloved wife, Rachel was unable to bear children.
Genesis 30:1-2
In I Samuel 1:1-2, 9-20 we read about Hannah.
Luke 1:5-25
Maybe you don’t feel like you “fit”, because you aren’t like everyone else in your social circles. We see throughout the Bible that we aren’t to derive our value from what we are able to do, or what we are like. Our value comes from being made in the image of God. He loved us enough to send His Son into the world, to make a way for a restored relationship between Him and us.
Saturday, July 07, 2018
#StandingWithOurSisters #TheFall #TheCurse
The Sermon on the Mount is a pivotal teaching of Jesus’. For many people, many churches and even some denominations, the Sermon on the Mount is held as an ethic of the kingdom. However, for the first 20-25 years of my life, would you believe that I was taught in numerous churches, high school, and a couple colleges that the Sermon on the Mount is something that we as followers of Jesus don’t really have to worry about now? It is true. For most of my spiritual upbringing, I was told that the Sermon on the Mount will be the law of the land, so to speak, during the millennial reign of Jesus spoken of in Revelation. But for now, it pretty much can be set aside.
In my mid-to late 20’s, when I spent a fair amount of time in serious study of the Gospels, I started to question what I had been taught about the Sermon. I wasn’t comfortable with what I had been taught, but I wasn’t sure exactly what the ramifications would be if what I had believed all along was wrong.
Throughout our lives, as we continue to study the scriptures and look to the leading of the Holy Spirit to guide and direct us, we hopefully will grow in our knowledge and understanding of the Bible. At times we may get things wrong. But when we fall down, we can give up, or we can learn from our mistakes, get back up and prayerfully ask God to show us what He is trying to teach us from His word.
Sometimes as you spend time meditating and studying a passage you start to see things that you’ve never seen before. This is why, once again, I will say that I strongly encourage you all to study the scriptures for yourself and compare what I say with what the Bible itself says. There are a lot of opinions out there, some are likely accurate, and others aren’t.
For example, in studying for today’s sermon I read probably 30 commentaries and very few of them agreed on much. Some were dogmatic that it must mean such and such, and others were adamant that it must mean something completely different than the first group mentioned.
Some of the commentaries were not even consistent in their understanding between Genesis chapters 1-2 and chapter 3.
With all of this being said, I want to attempt to move forward in looking at Genesis 3, and the account of Adam and Eve’s choosing sin over obedience to God.
Genesis 3:1-19
Adam was told in Genesis 2 that he was not to eat the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil.
Genesis 2:15-17
C.S. Lewis had this to say about man and free will in his book Mere Christianity. (C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996), pp. 52-53)
“God created things which had free will. That means creatures which can go wrong or right. Some people think they can imagine a creature which was free but had no possibility of going wrong, but I can't. If a thing is free to be good it's also free to be bad. And free will is what has made evil possible. Why, then, did God give them free will? Because free will, though it makes evil possible, is also the only thing that makes possible any love or goodness or joy worth having. A world of automata -of creatures that worked like machines- would hardly be worth creating. The happiness which God designs for His higher creatures is the happiness of being freely, voluntarily united to Him and to each other in an ecstasy of love and delight compared with which the most rapturous love between a man and a woman on this earth is mere milk and water. And for that they've got to be free.
And as we move into Genesis 3, we see it didn’t take long for Adam and Eve to sin.
Genesis 3:1-8
Genesis 3:8-13
Adam and Eve sinned. And, much like us today, when confronted about their sin, they tried to pass the buck. Any parent of at least two children is familiar with this scenario. You ask child one why they did something naughty towards child two and they respond that it wasn’t their fault, child two started it. In their mind, they aren’t to blame for their action, because …it’s their fault that I did what I did. As parents we sometimes may not see the whole picture. God, sees all and knows not only what we do but the heart attitude behind our actions. So, when God handed out His judgment on the Serpent, Eve and Adam, He knew the whole story.
The harshest judgment came against the serpent. Not only are they to be “cursed..more than…every beast of the field”, for their action, but verse 15 the ultimate defeat of this enemy is prophesied. One day The offspring of the woman, namely Jesus Christ, would hand the serpent its final defeat.
16 To the woman He said, “I will greatly multiply Your pain in childbirth, In pain you will bring forth children; Yet your desire will be for your husband, And he will rule over you.”
First off, God said “I will greatly multiply Your pain in childbirth, In pain you will bring forth children”.
One commentary says that “Physically she would experience multiplied pain (‘itstsebhon) especially as it is associated with childbirth. She who sought sweet delights in eating the fruit found not delights but pain, not joy, but sorrow.” (Smith, J. E. (1993). The Pentateuch (2nd ed., pp. 70–71). Joplin, MO: College Press Pub. Co.).
But other commentaries go further by pointing out that the idea put forth in this pronouncement involves more than just pain in child birth. “. I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception.” … And for us men, we should keep in mind, as this same commentary points out, that “The pains of childbirth are in Scripture emblematic of the severest anguish both of body and mind(cf. Ps. 48:6; Micah 4:9, 10; 1 Thess. 5:3; John 16:21; Rev. 12:2)” (Spence-Jones, H. D. M. (Ed.). (1909). Genesis (pp. 66–67). London; New York: Funk & Wagnalls Company.)
Another commentary went further and said “Some take this to refer to the introduction of a monthly… menstrual cycle” as it is now. (Richards, L. O. (1991). The Bible reader’s companion (electronic ed., p. 27). Wheaton: Victor Books.)
This portion of the judgment, while varying some in interpretation, all the sources I read acknowledge that there will be pain now surrounding pregnancy and birth, where they likely wouldn’t have been pain before. With this assessment I agree.
The second half of the pronouncement to Eve carries much more controversy.
There is one camp that says the woman’s desire is sexual in nature.
One commentary put it this way. “(Eve’s) sin… tainted her relationship with her husband. “Desire… and its meaning in our passage is highly disputed. It has been explained widely as sexual desire on the basis of Song 7:10 [““I am my beloved’s, And his desire is for me.”] and the reference to childbirth in 3:15. If so, the adversative rendering of the following clause, “yet he will rule” (as NASB, NRSV), would mean that despite her painful experience in childbirth she will still have (sexual) desires for her husband. In other words, the promissory blessing of procreation will persist despite any possible reluctance on her part due to the attendant pain of delivery. Others view the woman’s desire as broader, including an emotional or economic reliance on her husband. In other words, she acted independently of her husband in eating the fruit, and the consequent penalty is that she will become dependent on him.
I’ll be honest. Up to this point, K.A. Mathews has summarized two of the more common interpretations fairly well, in my opinion. However, he didn’t stop there.
Her new desire is to be submissive to the man, and, quite naturally, he will oblige by ruling over her. (Mathews, K. A. (1996). Genesis 1-11:26 (Vol. 1A, pp. 249–252). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.)
If this is part of the judgment on Eve, there must be a better explanation.
Let’s consider another commentary, “A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures”:
“And thy desire shall be to thy husband. This sentence obtains its full significance in its embracing that which follows, and in its contrast to it. It is, emphatically, that her desire should be to the man as though she were magically bound to him. … It is further emphatic that the man shall rule over her in a strong way; and finally that she, in her bound and destined adherence to man, shall find in him a strong and severe master.” (Lange, J. P., Schaff, P., Lewis, T., & Gosman, A. (2008). A commentary on the Holy Scriptures: Genesis (pp. 237–238). Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.)
“The expression indicates that the forthcoming helper was to be of similar nature to the man himself, corresponding by way of supplement to the incompleteness of his lonely being, and in every way adapted to be his co-partner and companion. (Spence-Jones, H. D. M. (Ed.). (1909). Genesis (p. 50). London; New York: Funk & Wagnalls Company.)
Going back to the “Commentary on the Holy Scriptures” we read that as a result of the Fall:
I want to expound upon this thought that things were to get worse before they get better. Ultimately, I believe the worth of women and men should be viewed as equal, as stated above. But before I get into that I want to read just a little more from this commentary about how things would get much worse for woman after the fall, before they would get better. So, as we keep in mind man and woman were both created in the image of God, we don’t have to look far to see that after sin entered the picture, they were treated as anything but equals.
“Among the Hebrews a wife was bought by the husband (? ch. 34:12; Exod. 22:16; Hos. 3:3, 2). and was his possession (female slave, ? ch. 20:3; Deut. 22:22). He is called her lord (ch. 18:21; Exod. 21:3), and he can divorce her without much ceremony (Deut. 24:1). This subordinate and depressed condition of the wife the author regards as the punishment of sin.” Knobel.— (Lange, et al.)
I’ve shared some of what others have to say about the punishment pronounced on Eve, but I want to share my thoughts now, before quickly trying to finish up for today.
After reading and studying both this passage, as well as others, I do believe the better explanation of the pronouncement of Eve’s “desire” in verse 16 is in regards to wishing to either “emancipate” herself from man, or to seek to elevate herself as a position of authority, whereas originally created they would have been co-partners. This makes more sense logically, since if her “desire” were merely a sexual desire for her husband, as some believe, it would indicate that sexual desire of a woman for her husband would not have been part of God’s original plan, but rather would be a part of His judgment for her sinning.
Seeing the proclamation of judgment the way I do, I see both physical and psychological aspects of the punishment.
As far as the psychological punishment, Eve’s “desire” and him ruling over her, I think these can be in a different category altogether. These are aspects that may be reversed when a husband and a wife are living in subjection to Jesus. By implication, Eve’s desire to either brush off the partnership that God intended for those made in His image, or to seek to lord over her husband, were falling short of God’s perfect plan. And, in turn, the pronouncement that the man would “rule over” her, would also fall outside of the perfect plan that God had planned.
So, when we realize we are living outside of what God’s perfect will is for us, what are we to do? On our own, and in our own strength we cannot overcome our sin nature. But thanks be to God, through the completed work of Jesus Christ we no longer have to be slaves to our sin nature. That which sin corrupted, can be made right again.
2 Corinthians 5:14-17 tells us that if we are in Christ, we should not continue to live according to the way our sin nature had us living, but we should remember that in Christ we now have the power to throw off the sin that corrupted us.
14 For the love of Christ controls us, having concluded this, that one died for all, therefore all died; 15 and He died for all, so that they who live might no longer live for themselves, but for Him who died and rose again on their behalf.
17 Then to Adam He said, “Because you have listened to the voice of your wife, and have eaten from the tree about which I commanded you, saying, ‘You shall not eat from it’; Cursed is the ground because of you; In toil you will eat of it All the days of your life. 18 “Both thorns and thistles it shall grow for you; And you will eat the plants of the field; 19 By the sweat of your face You will eat bread, Till you return to the ground, Because from it you were taken; For you are dust, And to dust you shall return.”
Above I noted that of the three judgments handed out the serpents was the harshest. Not only was the serpent itself cursed, God proclaimed that one day they would be completely destroyed through the promised “seed” of the woman, namely Jesus. When it comes to both Eve and Adam, while their judgments were difficult to take, they and their offspring have hope that what was corrupted by their willful sinning, can be made right before God because of the work that He has accomplished on the cross through Jesus.
While the physical effects of sin may linger, the consequences of our sin before God can be removed.
On the flip side, maybe what I’ve said seems off or wrong to you. Maybe it goes against what you’ve been taught and believe. Once again, I encourage you to read the Bible and study it to see if what I’ve said is true or not.
I welcome any questions you may have on this topic. I don’t claim to know all the answers, and I know that I can and still do get things wrong at times. I’m trying to learn, and in the process I hope to be of encouragement to you as you seek to learn as well.